It has been described as among the biggest frauds of its kind in the United Kingdom.
In all 14 defendants have been sentenced for their involvement in a £28 million scheme to defraud more than 3,500 timeshare owners.
The targets were desperate to terminate age-old holiday ownership agreements and sought out assistance.
A large number were in the age range of 60 and 80. More than 500 of them parted with more than £10,000, and one individual transferred in excess of £80,000.
Those victimized were exposed to aggressive presentations lasting up to six hours. They were left out of pocket, holding useless fake "rewards" and still bound by high-priced timeshare contracts they frequently were unable to use.
The company at the heart of the scam was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took customers' funds to support the directors' lavish lifestyle of private schools, luxury homes and private jets.
The leader at the top of the firm, the company director, was handed a seven-and-half year prison term in January for fraudulent conspiracy.
On Friday, his spouse Nicola was among the last group to hear their sentences.
She was handed a 24-month deferred imprisonment at Southwark Crown Court after confessing to money laundering.
This has been a long time coming and represents a significant success for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and the Crown.
The first knowledge of SMT was in the that particular year. The position was in the reporting team of a news organization, producing documentary features.
A colleague mentioned that his parent had inherited the ownership of a vacation unit in a European resort and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to exit the agreement.
It is important to recall how common vacation properties had grown with British holidaymakers in the eighties and nineties.
Vacation properties allowed families to occupy the equivalent unit every year, or trade their vacation periods with other owners who had properties in other resorts. Roughly 600,000 vacation seekers accepted that opportunity.
The initial boom was paired with a many reports about rip-off merchants deceptively promoting investments. They were regularly featured on public interest shows.
The standard vacation property deal bound owners for decades.
In that period, those owners who had experienced their guaranteed place in the sunshine for a long time were advancing in years, and many were hoping to wave goodbye to their timeshares.
A number had declining mobility and were unable to visit their apartments. Some just believed they'd got all they wanted from them. And some had passed away, in many cases bequeathing their heirs to assume the deals - plus their yearly fees and service charges.
And that's where the family member had found herself. She looked online for solutions and discovered the organization, a business whose website claimed to release her from her deal.
But, having made a payment and arranged an appointment with them, her loved ones had doubts.
Further research uncovered many victims saying they had handed over cash and got nothing in return. In fact, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.
Our team commenced probing what was happening. It was rapidly apparent that there were questionable operators operating in the vacation property industry.
One lawyer had numerous client reports preparing to take action against SMT.
Reporters contacted individuals who had dealt with the organization and they each reported similar experiences. They assumed the company would buy their property off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no re-sale value.
Instead, they were persuaded - indeed coerced - to commit further cash investing in "the company's points system", associated with the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.
The precise definition was rather ambiguous. They seemed similar to a kind of currency, offering cheaper vacations and amenities and retail offers.
And they were seemingly "exchangeable with other owners, eventually.
Investing money at the time would result in an long-term benefit that would cover the company's charges and result in the property owner ahead financially, liberated eventually from their pesky contract.
Too good to be true? Indeed, it was.
Assuming these reports were correct, this was a major deception.
It's what is called a "misleading sales."
An operator - specifically the company - "lures the consumer by advertising a defined offering but then to state it cannot be provided, directing the client in the direction of a different, lower-quality option.
This is against the law. Possessing all the evidence we had assembled, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the organization's sessions.
This takes time, effort, and compelling reasons for why this is the only way to obtain the information needed to confirm deceptive practices.
With approval secured, our small team arranged a appointment with one of the firm's agents in the location.
Pretending to be a potential client aiming to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement
A professional poker player with over a decade of experience in high-stakes tournaments, specializing in Texas Hold'em strategy.